0-2.jpeg

It’s no small thing to throw the symbolic weight of Princeton University behind a cause. As such, it’s been deeply encouraging to see President Eisgruber’s recent advocacy on behalf of the trans community and his leadership in the university’s challenge against President Donald Trump’s DACA decision. President Eisgruber’s actions have shown that in some cases, he is willing to put resources and reputation on the line for justice, and that he is an effective advocate when he chooses to do so.

These developments make President Eisgruber’s recent statements on Students for Prison Education and Reform’s (SPEAR) Ban the Box campaign all the more disappointing. After a Council of the Princeton University Community (CPUC) presentation from several SPEAR members on Monday afternoon, President Eisgruber announced that he, as the final arbiter of whether the University bans the box, was largely opposed. 
The Ban the Box campaign at Princeton began in 2012, and asks the University to remove the question regarding an applicant’s criminal record from its application. Now that the Common App itself announced that it would be removing the box from its application altogether, it is an individual university’s decision whether to ask the question on its supplemental applications. 

Read the full op-ed to see SPEAR’S response: http://www.dailyprincetonian.com/article/2018/11/a-response-to-president-eisgruber-why-we-cant-reformulate-the-box

ALSO — Check out the recent press coverage about the Ban the Box efforts on campus:

Eisgruber argues against Ban the Box objectives at CPUC meeting:

http://www.dailyprincetonian.com/article/2018/11/michaels-cpuc

It’s time to Ban the Box:

http://www.dailyprincetonian.com/article/2018/11/its-time-to-ban-the-box


Comment